Hi Javier,
this change looks good to me.
Thanks, Roland.
On 02/27/2011 09:54 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
struct ieee80211_ops.ampdu_action function pointer definition now includes a
u8 buf_size parameter.
Update wl_ops_ampdu_action handler function according to this new signature.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas<martinez.javier@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c
index 7645c6c..345243b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int wl_ops_sta_remove(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
static int wl_ops_ampdu_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
enum ieee80211_ampdu_mlme_action action,
- struct ieee80211_sta *sta, u16 tid, u16 *ssn);
+ struct ieee80211_sta *sta, u16 tid, u16 *ssn,
+ u8 buf_size);
static void wl_ops_rfkill_poll(struct ieee80211_hw *hw);
static int wl_ops_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -609,7 +610,8 @@ static int
wl_ops_ampdu_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
enum ieee80211_ampdu_mlme_action action,
- struct ieee80211_sta *sta, u16 tid, u16 *ssn)
+ struct ieee80211_sta *sta, u16 tid, u16 *ssn,
+ u8 buf_size)
{
#if defined(BCMDBG)
struct scb *scb = (struct scb *)sta->drv_priv;
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
