Hi Chao,
On 2018/8/2 17:39, Chao Yu wrote:
> As Stephen Rothwell reported:
>
> "After merging the staging tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_read_super':
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:17: error: 'MS_RDONLY' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IS_RDONLY'?
> sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY | MS_NOATIME;
> ^~~~~~~~~
> IS_RDONLY
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:17: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:29: error: 'MS_NOATIME' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'S_NOATIME'?
> sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY | MS_NOATIME;
> ^~~~~~~~~~
> S_NOATIME
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_mount':
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:501:10: warning: passing argument 5 of 'mount_bdev' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> &priv, erofs_fill_super);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:0,
> from drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:14:
> include/linux/fs.h:2151:23: note: expected 'size_t {aka long unsigned int}' but argument is of type 'int (*)(struct super_block *, void *, int)'
> extern struct dentry *mount_bdev(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> ^~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:500:9: error: too few arguments to function 'mount_bdev'
> return mount_bdev(fs_type, flags, dev_name,
> ^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:0,
> from drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:14:
> include/linux/fs.h:2151:23: note: declared here
> extern struct dentry *mount_bdev(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> ^~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: At top level:
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:518:20: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> .mount = erofs_mount,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:518:20: note: (near initialization for 'erofs_fs_type.mount')
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_remount':
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:630:12: error: 'MS_RDONLY' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IS_RDONLY'?
> *flags |= MS_RDONLY;
> ^~~~~~~~~
> IS_RDONLY
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: At top level:
> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:640:16: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> .remount_fs = erofs_remount,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by various commits creating erofs in the staging tree interacting
> with various commits redoing the mount infrastructure in the vfs tree.
>
> I have disabed CONFIG_EROFS_FS for now:"
>
> The reason of compiling error is:
>
> Since -next collects and merges developing patches including common vfs
> stuff from multi-trees, but those patches didn't cover erofs, such as:
>
> ('vfs: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled")
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=109b45090d7d3ce2797bb1ef7f70eead5bfe0ff3
>
> ("vfs: Require specification of size of mount data for internal mounts")
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=0a191e4505a4f255e6513b49426213da69bf0e80
>
> Above vfs related patches has not been merged in staging tree, if we
> submit those erofs patches to staging mailing list and after including
> them in staging-{test,nexts} tree, it can easily cause compiling error.
>
> We worked out some patches to adjust those vfs change, but now we just
> submit them to -next tree temporarily to avoid compiling error.
>
> For potentail conflict in between erofs and vfs changes in incoming
> merge window, Stephen suggested that we can disable CONFIG_EROFS_FS
> temporarily to pass merge window, and after that we can do restore by
> reenabling CONFIG_EROFS_FS and applying those fixing patches. Also
> Greg confirmed this solution.
>
> So, let's disable compiling erofs for a while.
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig
> index 663b755bf2fb..96f614934df1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>
> config EROFS_FS
> tristate "EROFS filesystem support"
> - depends on BLOCK
> + depends on BROKEN
How about remaining "depends on BLOCK" but just adding "depends on BROKEN"?
Thanks
Gao Xiang
> help
> EROFS(Enhanced Read-Only File System) is a lightweight
> read-only file system with modern designs (eg. page-sized
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
