On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:07 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:07:33PM -0700, Todd Poynor wrote:
> > From: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Drop gasket logging calls in favor of standard logging.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_sysfs.c | 73 +++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_sysfs.c b/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_sysfs.c
> > index 1c5f7502e0d5e..418b81797e638 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_sysfs.c
> > @@ -3,7 +3,9 @@
> > #include "gasket_sysfs.h"
> >
> > #include "gasket_core.h"
> > -#include "gasket_logging.h"
> > +
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/printk.h>
> >
> > /*
> > * Pair of kernel device and user-specified pointer. Used in lookups in sysfs
> > @@ -66,7 +68,7 @@ static struct gasket_sysfs_mapping *get_mapping(struct device *device)
> > int i;
> >
> > if (!device) {
> > - gasket_nodev_error("Received NULL device!");
> > + pr_debug("%s: Received NULL device\n", __func__);
>
> I know you are just trying to clean up the logging mess, but this type
> of check isn't even needed, as it's impossible.
Ah, yeah, I noticed it when I was converting, I'll put this on my list
to clean up in next round, thanks.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
