Fix checkpatch.pl warning: "Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rs" reapable is not used to access h/w directly, so volatile is not necessary. >From reading the code, the contexts in which the field may be updated/accessed across threads are protected by the hw->ctlxq.lock spinlock, where hw is the device struct, so appears thread-safe. Signed-off-by: Tim Collier <osdevtc@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h index 67a944c0d690..992ebaa1071f 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ struct hfa384x_usbctlx { enum ctlx_state state; /* Tracks running state */ struct completion done; - volatile int reapable; /* Food for the reaper task */ + int reapable; /* Food for the reaper task */ ctlx_cmdcb_t cmdcb; /* Async command callback */ ctlx_usercb_t usercb; /* Async user callback, */ -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel