On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 02:57:26PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > It's good to have SPDX identifiers in driver files to make it easier to > audit the kernel tree for correct licenses. > > Fix up the one of staging pci-mt7621.c file to have a proper SPDX > identifier, based on the license text in the file itself. The SPDX > identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of > the full boiler plate text. > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c | 28 ++-------------------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c b/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c > index b4e049a..d92df91 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c > @@ -1,32 +1,10 @@ > -/************************************************************************** > - * > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 Ok, but: > - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > - * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the > - * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your > - * option) any later version. You used the wrong license for the SPDX line :( PLEASE be careful about this, it matters as it is a legal thing you are dealing with. If you don't know how to read licenses, just leave it all alone and do not guess. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
