On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:32:09PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote: > > On 06/26/18 22:17, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 21:44 +0200, Michael Straube wrote: > > > On 06/26/18 19:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Michael Straube > > > > <straube.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Use ether_addr_copy() instead of memcpy() to copy the mac address. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by ? > > > > > > > > > > I'll add it. Sorry, I was not aware of the Suggested-by tag. > > > > > > > Btw, ensure that the source and destination buffers are aligned to u16 > > > > as required by API. > > > > > > To be honest I'm not sure how to do that excactly. > > > > > > Use __align(2) in the array declarations? e.g.: > > > > > > u8 mac[ETH_ALEN] __align(2); > > > > All initial function automatics are naturally aligned. > > > > So there is nothing to change? Now I'm confused. Do not add the __align(2), as Joe says, it's not required. You just need to C alignment rules (it's expected/required for this sort of patch). Like if you have a struct: struct foo { char a; int b; }; There is going to be a 3 byte gap between a and b because ints are normally __align(4). The exception is when the struct is __packed. So sizeof(struct foo) in this case is going to be 8. kmalloc() returns pointers which are 8 at least byte aligned normally. See ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN. There is one arch where it's 4 byte aligned? So when you would get things which aren't __align(2) is when you have: struct bar { char a[3]; u8 mac[ETH_ALEN]; }; Here the struct member before the mac[] is an odd number of char. Or when the struct is packed. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel