On Thu, Jun 14 2018, Souptick Joarder wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:59 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 12 2018, Souptick Joarder wrote: >> >>> On 12-Jun-2018 2:21 AM, "Greg KH" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:00:47AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: >>>> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> > >>>> > If no further comment, we would like to get this patch in 4.18-rc-X. >>>> >>>> Why? Is it a regression fix? That's all that is allowed after -rc1. >>> >>> No, this is not regression fix. We need to get this into 4.18-rc-1. But >>> mostly it can't make into linus tree in rc-1 :) >>>> >>>> And have you tried applying it to Linus's current tree? :) >>> >>> Last tested on 4.17-rc-6 and it worked fine. Let me verify in current tree. >>> >> >> As you have undoubtedly noticed, lustre is no longer in Linus' tree. >> I'm experimenting with maintaining a branch which retains the code >> (lustre/* in github.com/neilbrown/linux) so we can get it ready for >> merging properly. >> I've added you patch to my tree. > > You need to add this patch in your tree as well. > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20180614&id=1c8f422059ae5da07db7406ab916203f9417e396 > > This patch appears to be missing in your github branch. ?? That patch is in 4.17-rc1 (v4.17-rc1~99^2~6) and my lustre trees are based on 4.17 (at least). My 'master' might be a bit behind - maybe that confused you. Thanks, NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
