On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 03:24:25AM +0100, Klaas Neirinck wrote: > On 18/02/2011 22:27, Greg KH wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 03:58:45AM +0100, Klaas Neirinck wrote: > >>Fixed a coding style issue. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Klaas Neirinck<klaas.nerinck@xxxxxxxxx> > >This doesn't apply at all to the linux-next tree, what did you do it > >against? > > > >confused, > > > >greg k-h > I did it against > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git > as shown in http://www.youtube.com/fosdemtalks#p/u/0/LLBrBBImJt4 > great talk btw! Thanks, but the patches really need to be against linux-next, which I didn't really spell out very well in that talk, sorry. linux-next contains all of the patches that others have sent me that are queued up for the next kernel release after this one. Hope this helps, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
