Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Andrew, Vivien, if the following hunks get applied are we possibly
> breaking mv88e6xxx? This is the use case that is really missing IMHO at
> the moment in DSA: we cannot control the VLAN membership and attributes
> of the CPU port(s), so either we make it always tagged in every VLAN
> (not great), or we introduce the ability to target the CPU port which is
> what Petr's patches + mine do.
Your change looks good to me. mv88e6xxx programs the DSA and CPU ports'
membership as "unmodified" (i.e. "as-is", which is a Marvell feature),
so that shouldn't change the current behavior.
Thanks,
Vivien
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
