On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 02:38:09PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:53:08PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > On Sun, May 20 2018, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > > > > > The data passed between irq related functions and the ones which have > > > > been retrieved where different. Also first data haven't properly > > > > set on irq_domain_add_linear call where it was passing NULL instead. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Tested-by: NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > NeilBrown > > > > Thanks, Neil. > > > > So I'll send v5 of this series to make things easier. > > I'll join this PATCH with PATCH 5 and make TODO file > > empty. > > > Ugh, I'm totally confused now. What is the "correct" patch series to > consider for merging here? v5? Something else? Actually to make it easier on my side (which I need to optimize for due to the heavy patch load), I've dropped all of your patches in my queue. Please resend whatever I have not yet applied that is ready to be considered for merging. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
