On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> +struct ipi_arg_ex {
> + u32 vector;
> + u32 reserved;
> + struct hv_vpset vp_set;
Please align that in tabular fashion for easy of reading
u32 vector;
u32 reserved;
struct hv_vpset vp_set;
> +};
> +
> static struct apic orig_apic;
>
> static u64 hv_apic_icr_read(void)
> @@ -97,6 +103,40 @@ static void hv_apic_eoi_write(u32 reg, u32 val)
> * IPI implementation on Hyper-V.
> */
>
> +static int __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
> +{
> + int nr_bank = 0;
> + struct ipi_arg_ex **arg;
> + struct ipi_arg_ex *ipi_arg;
> + int ret = 1;
> + unsigned long flags;
This is really horrible to read.
struct ipi_arg_ex *ipi_arg;
struct ipi_arg_ex **arg;
unsigned long flags;
bool ret = false;
int nr_bank = 0;
is really more conveniant for quick reading.
So the other more limited function has a lot more sanity checks vs. vector
number and other things. Why are they not required here? Comment please.
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + arg = (struct ipi_arg_ex **)this_cpu_ptr(hyperv_pcpu_input_arg);
> +
> + ipi_arg = *arg;
> + if (unlikely(!ipi_arg))
> + goto ipi_mask_ex_done;
> +
> + ipi_arg->vector = vector;
> + ipi_arg->reserved = 0;
> + ipi_arg->vp_set.valid_bank_mask = 0;
> +
> + if (!cpumask_equal(mask, cpu_present_mask)) {
> + ipi_arg->vp_set.format = HV_GENERIC_SET_SPARCE_4K;
> + nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset(&(ipi_arg->vp_set), mask);
nr_bank really confused me. bank_nr is what you mean, not number of banks,
right?
> + }
> + if (!nr_bank)
> + ipi_arg->vp_set.format = HV_GENERIC_SET_ALL;
> +
> + ret = hv_do_rep_hypercall(HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX, 0, nr_bank,
> + ipi_arg, NULL);
> +
> +ipi_mask_ex_done:
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + return ret;
> +}
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
