On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:59:00AM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > --- a/drivers/staging/hv/hv.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/hv.c > @@ -230,7 +230,12 @@ int hv_init(void) > * Allocate the hypercall page memory > * virtaddr = osd_page_alloc(1); > */ > - virtaddr = osd_virtual_alloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE); > +#ifdef __x86_64__ > + virtaddr = __vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC); > +#else > + virtaddr = __vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL, > + __pgprot(__PAGE_KERNEL & (~_PAGE_NX))); > +#endif I'm not saying this patch is wrong at all, but I still don't understand why this is different depending on the architecture of the machine. Why is this necessary, it should be ok to do the same type of allocation no matter what the processor is, right? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
