On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +static struct pxa_ssp_info pxa_ssp_infos[] = {
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp1_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp1_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp1_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp1_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp2_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp2_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp2_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp2_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp3_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp3_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp3_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp3_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp4_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp4_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp4_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp4_tx", },
> +};
This part looks odd to me, you're adding an extra level of indirection to
do two stages of lookups in some form of platform data.
Why can't you just always use "rx" and "tx" as the names here?
(also, I don't see why each line is duplicated, but I'm sure there's
an easy answer for that).
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
