Re: [PATCH 00/11] staging: wilc1000: fix for checkpatch and handled malloc memory properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Claudiu,

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:55:52 +0300
Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 27.03.2018 10:22, Ajay Singh wrote:
> > 
> > Please let me know, in case I have to rework and resubmit this patch
> > series to make them into staging branch.
> >   
> 
> As I suggested in patch 6, I prefer having the same format for
> wilc_wfi_cfg_tx_vendor_spec() and wilc_wfi_cfg_parse_rx_vendor_spec(). I
> think this could be achieved. To merge them I don't think would be feasible.
> 
> This series could go as is but I would like to see another future patch to
> treat the format of wilc_wfi_cfg_tx_vendor_spec().
> 

Sure, I had noted the review comments received for patch#6 & patch#1. I
will include the code modification in another future patches to handle it.


Regards,
Ajay
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux