On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:25:42PM +0530, Ajay Singh wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> index 1b6fe64..af1b8aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> @@ -460,6 +460,17 @@ static void cfg_scan_result(enum scan_event scan_event,
> }
> }
>
> +static inline bool wilc_wfi_cfg_scan_time_expired(int i)
"i" is the wrong parameter to pass. The name is not useful. Probably
the right parameter is either &last_scanned_shadow[i] or
last_scanned_shadow[i].time_scan_cached.
> +{
> + unsigned long now = jiffies;
> +
> + if (time_after(now, last_scanned_shadow[i].time_scan_cached +
> + (unsigned long)(nl80211_SCAN_RESULT_EXPIRE - (1 * HZ))))
> + return true;
> + else
> + return false;
Also I think it you apply this patch and then run checkpatch.pl --strict
against the file it will complain that it should be:
if (time_after(now, last_scanned_shadow[i].time_scan_cached +
(unsigned long)(nl80211_SCAN_RESULT_EXPIRE - (1 * HZ))))
return true;
return false;
> +}
> +
> int wilc_connecting;
>
> static void cfg_connect_result(enum conn_event conn_disconn_evt,
> @@ -505,17 +516,14 @@ static void cfg_connect_result(enum conn_event conn_disconn_evt,
> bool scan_refresh = false;
> u32 i;
>
> - memcpy(priv->associated_bss, conn_info->bssid, ETH_ALEN);
> + memcpy(priv->associated_bss, conn_info->bssid,
> + ETH_ALEN);
>
It basically always helps me if the "new function" changes are in a
patch by themselves. These lines are a pure white space changes and I
have a script that reviews those for me instantly, but when it's mixed
with this patch I have to do it by hand.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
