On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:39:22AM -0700, Kenny Ballou wrote: > > On 2018年01月12日 13:21 GMT, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:10:17AM -0700, Kenny Ballou wrote: > >> >> @@ -1468,7 +1472,8 @@ static void XGI_SetLVDSRegs(unsigned short ModeIdIndex, > >> >> tempax |= tempcx; > >> >> > >> >> xgifb_reg_set(pVBInfo->Part1Port, 0x15, tempax); > >> >> - xgifb_reg_set(pVBInfo->Part1Port, 0x14, > >> >> + xgifb_reg_set(pVBInfo->Part1Port, > >> >> + 0x14, > >> >> (unsigned short)(tempbx & 0xff)); > >> >> > >> >> tempax = pVBInfo->VT; > >> > > >> > I just don't understand why you're doing this... > >> > > >> > >> This was mainly to fix checkpatch warnings about line length. If it's > >> preferred to not fix these, I will change the patch. > > > > > > There is probably a checkpatch warning about CamelCase? It's not over > > 80 characters. > > Correct, there are many in this driver. However, as a new submitter, I > was specifically choosing warnings over "checks" as I wasn't sure what > the preferred resolution is for "checks" and specifically CamelCase > issues. Moreover, CamelCase fixes are arguably a different patch, no? > Possibly part of the series, but a different patch nonetheless. We seem to be talking at cross purposes. Yes, CamelCase is a different patch. I was just trying to guess where you went wrong. You are sending a patch that "fixes long line warnings" but: xgifb_reg_set(pVBInfo->Part1Port, 0x14, This is a short line... Anyway, try to resend it and hopefully it will be better in v2. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel