Hi Andy and Dan, On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:24:36PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:59:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> @@ -1147,10 +1145,8 @@ static int gc2235_probe(struct i2c_client *client) > >> if (ret) > >> gc2235_remove(client); > > > > This error handling is probably wrong... > > > > Thanks for pointing to this, but I'm not going to fix this by the > following reasons: > 1. I admit the driver's code is ugly > 2. It's staging code > 3. My patch does not touch those lines > 4. My purpose is to get it working first. > > Feel free to send a followup with a good clean up which I agree with. Yeah, there's a lot of ugly stuff in this driver... I understand Andy's patches address problems with functionality, let's make error handling fixes separately. So I'm applying these now. Thanks! -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
