On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:25 AM, David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Carlos Munoz <cmunoz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The Cavium OCTEON cn78xx and cn73xx SoCs have network packet I/O
>> hardware that is significantly different from previous generations of
>> the family.
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/octeon/octeon3-bgx-port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/octeon/octeon3-bgx-port.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..4dad35fa4270
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/octeon/octeon3-bgx-port.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2033 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2017 Cavium, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
>> + * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
>> + * for more details.
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/netdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_mdio.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_net.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>> +
>> +static void bgx_port_sgmii_set_link_down(struct bgx_port_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> + u64 data;
>> + data = oct_csr_read(BGX_GMP_PCS_MISC_CTL(priv->node, priv->bgx, priv->index));
>> + data |= BIT(11);
>> + oct_csr_write(data, BGX_GMP_PCS_MISC_CTL(priv->node, priv->bgx, priv->index));
>> + data = oct_csr_read(BGX_GMP_PCS_MISC_CTL(priv->node, priv->bgx, priv->index));
>
> Any particular reason to read immediately after write ?
>> +static int bgx_port_sgmii_set_link_speed(struct bgx_port_priv *priv, struct port_status status)
>> +{
>> + u64 data;
>> + u64 prtx;
>> + u64 miscx;
>> + int timeout;
>> +
>> +
>> + switch (status.speed) {
>> + case 10:
>
> In my opinion, instead of hard coding the value, is it fine to use ENUM ?
Similar comments applicable in other places where hard coded values are used.
>> +static int bgx_port_gser_27882(struct bgx_port_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> + u64 data;
>> + u64 addr;
>
>> + int timeout = 200;
>> +
>> + // timeout = 200;
Better to initialize the timeout value
>> +static int bgx_port_qlm_rx_equalization(struct bgx_port_priv *priv, int qlm, int lane)
>> +{
>> + lmode = oct_csr_read(GSER_LANE_MODE(priv->node, qlm));
>> + lmode &= 0xf;
>> + addr = GSER_LANE_P_MODE_1(priv->node, qlm, lmode);
>> + data = oct_csr_read(addr);
>> + /* Don't complete rx equalization if in VMA manual mode */
>> + if (data & BIT(14))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Apply rx equalization for speed > 6250 */
>> + if (bgx_port_get_qlm_speed(priv, qlm) < 6250)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Wait until rx data is valid (CDRLOCK) */
>> + timeout = 500;
>
> 500 us is the min required value or it can be further reduced ?
>> +static int bgx_port_init_xaui_link(struct bgx_port_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> +
>> + if (use_ber) {
>> + timeout = 10000;
>> + do {
>> + data =
>> + oct_csr_read(BGX_SPU_BR_STATUS1(priv->node, priv->bgx, priv->index));
>> + if (data & BIT(0))
>> + break;
>> + timeout--;
>> + udelay(1);
>> + } while (timeout);
>
> In my opinion, it's better to implement similar kind of loops inside macros.
>
>> + if (!timeout) {
>> + pr_debug("BGX%d:%d:%d: BLK_LOCK timeout\n",
>> + priv->bgx, priv->index, priv->node);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + timeout = 10000;
>> + do {
>> + data =
>> + oct_csr_read(BGX_SPU_BX_STATUS(priv->node, priv->bgx, priv->index));
>> + if (data & BIT(12))
>> + break;
>> + timeout--;
>> + udelay(1);
>> + } while (timeout);
> same here
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
