Joe,
Thank you for your comments!
> checkpatch is not always correct.
I did compile it beforehand and it was clean. Did I miss anything?
Regards,
Patryk
On 22 November 2017 at 18:33, Patryk Kocielnik
<patryk.kocielnik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Thank you for your comments!
>
> I did compile it beforehand and it was clean. Did I miss anything?
>
> Regards,
> Patryk
>
> On 22 November 2017 at 17:03, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 16:42 +0100, Patryk Kocielnik wrote:
>> > Cleaned checkpatch warnings by fixing coding style issues.
>>
>> checkpatch is not always correct.
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Patryk Kocielnik <patryk.kocielnik@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 4 ++--
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
>> > b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
>> []
>> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
>> > static int g_hwcursor = 1;
>> > static int g_noaccel;
>> > static int g_nomtrr;
>> > -static const char *g_fbmode[] = {NULL, NULL};
>> > +static const char * const g_fbmode[] = {NULL, NULL};
>>
>> Make sure you compile any file modified by a patch
>> _before_ submitting the proposed patch.
>>
>> > static const char *g_def_fbmode = "1024x768-32@60";
>> > static char *g_settings;
>> > static int g_dualview;
>> > @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ static int lynxfb_set_fbinfo(struct fb_info *info,
>> > int index)
>> > lynx750_ext, NULL, vesa_modes,
>> > };
>> > int cdb[] = {ARRAY_SIZE(lynx750_ext), 0, VESA_MODEDB_SIZE};
>> > - static const char *mdb_desc[] = {
>> > + static const char * const mdb_desc[] = {
>> > "driver prepared modes",
>> > "kernel prepared default modedb",
>> > "kernel HELPERS prepared vesa_modes",
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
