Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-dpaa2: Fix multiple assignments should be avoided

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:20:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:45:03PM -0500, Joshua Abraham wrote:
> > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > "CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided"
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joshua Abraham <j.abraham1776@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> > index 0d8ed002adcb..384218946108 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> > @@ -1661,7 +1661,8 @@ static void set_fq_affinity(struct dpaa2_eth_priv *priv)
> >  	 * This may well change at runtime, either through irqbalance or
> >  	 * through direct user intervention.
> >  	 */
> > -	rx_cpu = txc_cpu = cpumask_first(&priv->dpio_cpumask);
> > +	rx_cpu = cpumask_first(&priv->dpio_cpumask);
> > +	txc_cpu = rx_cpu;
> 
> The original code here makes much more sense, doesn't it?
> 
> Sometimes checkpatch is wrong :)

It feels like the majority of these multiple assignment warnings are
wrong.  I thought it would be a good idea at first but after looking at
a bunch of the patches it feels like we should just remove the check.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux