On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:03:35PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > I'm not a fan of the platform bus but I have mixed feelings about > creating a dedicated bus type. I guess if we really need a bus > type we can do it later? There was a discussion a while ago in the context of I2C/SPI MFDs which concluded that if you need a bus and it's going to be effectively noop then you should just use the platform bus as anything else will consist almost entirely of cut'n'paste from the platform bus with some light sed usage and code duplication is bad. It's not super lovely as it's not actually a memory mapped device but it's the best idea we've got.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
