On 30/10/17 11:38, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:35:50AM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 30/10/17 11:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
The right thing to do here is to respin your patch from last year which
converts the loopback driver to use the timeout handling in greybus
core.
Actually I wasn't clear if you wanted to to that yourself aswell as the
rest if it.
But sure I can do that conversion, it's on my list.
IIRC it was basically done. Just some odd locking that could now also be
removed.
Thanks,
Johan
I think once Kees' change is applied to operation.c and we convert the
async stuff to operation.c's callbacks there ought to be no use of
timers, linked lists of operations.
I'll probably need at least a day to look at that, so it'll be the
weekend before I can really allocate time.
---
bod
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
