Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> 4) As Kalle mentioned, rtlwifi contains many magic numbers, and I >> plan to fix them after rtl8723de and rtl8821ce. Because the drivers >> are developing, the changes will make us hard to integrate. However, >> I don't have plan to process the magic numbers in the module phydm, >> because the most of BB/RF registers contain many functions. And >> it doesn't have a register name but a bit field name instead. >> Our BB team guys say the use of enumeration or defined name will >> be unreadable, and the name is meaningless for most people. > > Experience with ath9k driver showed, that development was kind of > balanced between two groups, QCA and Community (Other companies, > researches, education and so on.). Saying: "you will not understand it > any way" is nor really helpful :) > Please don't repeat bad experience of Broadcom. I agree with Oleksij here, but I want to still point out that there are cases when using magic numbers are ok, for example look at ar5008_initvals.h from ath9k. So it depends on case by case. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
