Sorry about delay. Just sent the rebased patchset along with the comments addressed. Thanks & Regards, Badhri. On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:22:13PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: >> The source and sink caps should follow the following rules. >> This patch validates whether the src_caps/snk_caps adheres >> to it. >> >> 6.4.1 Capabilities Message >> A Capabilities message (Source Capabilities message or Sink >> Capabilities message) shall have at least one Power >> Data Object for vSafe5V. The Capabilities message shall also >> contain the sending Port’s information followed by up to >> 6 additional Power Data Objects. Power Data Objects in a >> Capabilities message shall be sent in the following order: >> >> 1. The vSafe5V Fixed Supply Object shall always be the first object. >> 2. The remaining Fixed Supply Objects, if present, shall be sent >> in voltage order; lowest to highest. >> 3. The Battery Supply Objects, if present shall be sent in Minimum >> Voltage order; lowest to highest. >> 4. The Variable Supply (non-battery) Objects, if present, shall be >> sent in Minimum Voltage order; lowest to highest. >> >> Errors in source/sink_caps of the local port will prevent >> the port registration. Whereas, errors in source caps of partner >> device would only log them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/staging/typec/pd.h | 2 + >> drivers/staging/typec/tcpm.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> drivers/staging/typec/tcpm.h | 16 +++---- >> 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > Now that these files are moved in my usb tree, can you rebase and resend > them? > > thanks, > > greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
