On 09/28/2017 02:53 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > (Resending for Mauro, while dropping the non-list recipients. The original > likely had too many recipients.) > > The V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE match criteria requires just one > struct to be filled (struct fwnode_handle). The V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_DEVNAME > match criteria requires just a device name. > > So, it doesn't make sense to enclose those into structs, > as the criteria can go directly into the union. > > That makes easier to document it, as we don't need to document > weird senseless structs. > > At drivers, this makes even clearer about the match criteria. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
