Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8712: Fix unbalanced braces around else statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 01:40:15AM +0100, Liam Ryan wrote:
> Fix checkpath-reported unbalanced braces in the following areas
> 
> 221: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:221:
> 392: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8712/os_intfs.c:392:
> 363: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_cmd.c:363:
> 889: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_recv.c:889:
> 902: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c:902:
> 84: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_set.c:84:
> 580: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_mlme.c:580:
> 593: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:593:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liam Ryan <liamryandev@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is my first patch and I have several doubts about style choices
> 
> At line 216 of hal_init.c should opening brace follow comment instead?
> 
> At line 577 of rtl871x_mlme.c should I bring logic to one line instead of
> opening the brace on the continued line?
> 
> At line 353 of rtl8712_cmd.c the if/else is technically only 1 line each.
> Should the braces still have been added per checkpath for readability?

I have no idea about any of these, as I'm not going to take the time to
dig in the source for it :)

Try making up a patch and submit it and see what we think about it, it
shouldn't be that hard.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux