As gcc-8 points out, the bit mask check makes no sense here:
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c: In function 'ext_sd_send_cmd_get_rsp':
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4130:25: error: bitwise comparison always evaluates to true [-Werror=tautological-compare]
However, the code is even more bogus, as we have already
checked for the SD_RSP_TYPE_R0 case earlier in the function
and returned success. As seen in the mmc/sd driver core,
SD_RSP_TYPE_R0 means "no response" anyway, so checking for
a particular response would not help either.
This just removes the nonsensical code to get rid of the
warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
index 4033a2cf7ac9..d548bc695f9e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
@@ -4125,12 +4125,6 @@ int ext_sd_send_cmd_get_rsp(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 cmd_idx, u32 arg,
rtsx_trace(chip);
return STATUS_FAIL;
}
-
- } else if (rsp_type == SD_RSP_TYPE_R0) {
- if ((ptr[3] & 0x1E) != 0x03) {
- rtsx_trace(chip);
- return STATUS_FAIL;
- }
}
}
}
--
2.9.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
