Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Changes since v9: > - Rebase to 4.13-rc3. > - Drop PATCH1 as it was already taken by Greg to char-misc tree. There're no > functional dependencies on this patch so the series can go through a different tree > (and it actually belongs to x86 if I got Ingo's comment right). > - Add in missing void return type in PATCH1 [Colin King, Ingo Molnar, Greg KH] > - A few minor fixes in what is now PATCH7: add pr_fmt, tiny style fix in > hyperv_flush_tlb_others() [Andy Shevchenko] > - Fix "error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_phys'" in PATCH2 > reported by kbuild test robot (#include <asm/io.h>) > - Add Steven's 'Reviewed-by:' to PATCH9. Thomas, Ingo, Greg, do I get it right that the intention is to take this series through x86 tree? (See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2561174.html) If so, is there anything else I need to do to get it accepted? Thanks, -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
