Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging/pi433:Removed Coding style issues from pi433_if.h and other dependencies arising from it.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:15:16AM +0200, Wolf Entwicklungen wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> I offered Greg to have an eye on the patches, that were submitted. He asked
> me to reply to those patches, I had a look for, with the Reviewed-by tag.
> 
> Now I am a bit unsure, what I should do.
> 
> Since I am interested in, I for sure will read every patch. It's just a little
> thing, to reply with reviewed-tag - if you / Greg like(s). I can do so on every
> reviewed patch, only on patches without need/wish of improvement or never.
> 
> Compiling every patch is a bit inconvenient.
> 
> Please let me know, what you and Greg would like.

That's fine, you don't need to build test them if you don't want to.
Greg is going to do it.

But in this case, it was pretty obvious that it was going to break git
bisect right?  That's not allowed.  You're not expected to know all the
rules when you start so that's fine.  I'm just trying to give you some
ideas what to look for in the future.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux