On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:19:28 +0200 Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This condition already uses an object of type ipv6hdr in the line above. > Use the object directly instead of calling ipv6_hdr > > Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c > index 63c98bb..06d591c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c > @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static u32 net_checksum_info(struct sk_buff *skb) > > if (ip6->nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP) > return TRANSPORT_INFO_IPV6_TCP; > - else if (ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP) > + else if (ip6->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP) > return TRANSPORT_INFO_IPV6_UDP; > } > Patch looks fine. Network patches go through netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx not linux driver mailing list. I will add it to my next patch of patches that are going to netdev for net-next. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
