On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:55:26PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > I don't agree with it as a static analysis dev... What I mean is if it's a macro that returns -ENODEV or a function that returns -ENODEV, they should both be treated the same. The other warnings this check prints are quite clever. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
