> When opening from kernel, we don't use file pointer. The count mismatch > is between tty->count and #fd's. So opening from kernel leads to #fd's > being less than tty->count. I thought this difference is relevant to > user-space opening of tty, and not to kernel opening of tty. Can you > suggest how to address this mismatch? Your kernel reference is the same as having a file open reference so I think this actually needs addressing in the maths. In other words count the number of kernel references and also add that into the test for check_tty_count (kernel references + #fds == count). I'd really like to keep this right because that check has a long history of catching really nasty race conditions in the tty code. The open/close/hangup code is really fragile so worth the debugability. > Ah may be I didn't notice the active bit. Is it one of the #defines in > tty.h? Can usage count and active bit be used to differentiate between > whether the tty was opened by kernel or user? It only tells you whether the port is currently active for some purpose, not which. If you still want to implement exclusivity between kernel and user then it needs another flag, but I think that flag should be in port->flags as it is a property of the physical interface. (Take a look at tty_port_open for example) Alan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
