On Jul 11, 2017, at 11:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:47:04AM +0000, Craig Inches wrote:
>> This fixes multiple block statements found not to match
>> style as per checkpatch
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <Craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/lnetst.h | 129 +++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/lnetst.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/lnetst.h
>> index ea736f8d5231..a4f9ff01d458 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/lnetst.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/lnetst.h
>> @@ -54,7 +54,8 @@
>> #define LSTIO_GROUP_ADD 0xC10 /* add group */
>> #define LSTIO_GROUP_LIST 0xC11 /* list all groups in session */
>> #define LSTIO_GROUP_INFO 0xC12 /* query default information of
>> - * specified group */
>> + * specified group
>> + */
>> #define LSTIO_GROUP_DEL 0xC13 /* delete group */
>> #define LSTIO_NODES_ADD 0xC14 /* add nodes to specified group */
>> #define LSTIO_GROUP_UPDATE 0xC15 /* update group */
>> @@ -102,27 +103,32 @@ struct lstcon_test_ent {
>> int tse_type; /* test type */
>> int tse_loop; /* loop count */
>> int tse_concur; /* concurrency of test */
>> -}; /*** test summary entry, for
>> - *** list_batch command */
>> +}; /* test summary entry, for
>> + * list_batch command
>> + */
>
> That's odd, what was the *** stuff for?
>
> I'd like to get a lustre maintainer's ack for all of these before I
> apply them...
It's nothing that I know about. We used DOxygen to comment the code and generate docs,
but the "***" isn't any markup that I'm familiar with.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
