On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:43:15PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote: > Replace all instances of (1 << 27) with BIT(27) to fix > checkpatch check messages > > Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga <rjdurga@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h > index da9ce19..686a251 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ > * set ATTR_BLOCKS to a high value to avoid any risk of collision with other > * ATTR_* attributes (see bug 13828) > */ > -#define ATTR_BLOCKS (1 << 27) > +#define ATTR_BLOCKS BIT(27) Isn't this used in lustre's userspace code? If so, you can't use the BIT() macro there :( Please check before you redo this. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
