On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:49:33 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 02:59:42PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 16:38:19 -0500 > > Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:22:04PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > When Intel 10G (ixgbevf) is passed to a Hyper-V guest with SR-IOV, > > > > the driver requests affinity with all possible CPU's (0-239) even > > > > those CPU's are not online (and will never be). Because of this the device > > > > is unable to correctly get MSI interrupt's setup. > > > > > > > > This was caused by the change in 4.12 that converted this affinity > > > > into all possible CPU's (0-31) but then host reports > > > > an error since this is larger than the number of online cpu's. > > > > > > > > Previously, this worked (up to 4.12-rc1) because only online cpu's > > > > would be put in mask passed to the host. > > > > > > > > This patch applies only to 4.12. > > > > The driver in linux-next needs a a different fix because of the changes > > > > to PCI host protocol version. > > > > > > If Linus decides to postpone v4.12 a week, I can ask him to pull this. But > > > I suspect he will release v4.12 today. In that case, I don't know what to > > > do with this other than maybe send it to Greg for a -stable release. > > > > Looks like this will have to be queued for 4.12 stable. > > I assume you'll take care of this, right? It sounds like there's nothing > to do for upstream because it needs a different fix. > > Bjorn Already fixed in Linux-next. The code is different for PCI 1.2 version and never had the bug. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel