On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 06:37:07 -0400
Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:03:51 -0400
> > Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > tsl2x7x_read_thresh() and tsl2x7x_write_thresh() currently assumes
> > > that IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE is the only iio_event_info that will be
> > > passed in. This patch refactors these two functions so that
> > > additional iio_event_infos can be passed in. The functions are
> > > renamed from tsl2x7x_{read,write}_thresh() to
> > > tsl2x7x_{read,write}_event_value(). This patch also adds the
> > > missing return value check to tsl2x7x_invoke_change() since this
> > > was previously missing.
> > >
> > Hmm.. Why make this change? Are there additional uses of this
> > function on the way?
> >
> > If not I wouldn't necessarily worry about the naming or the
> > assumptions as the assumptions are enforced by the driver
> > anyway. Nothing wrong with a bit of paranoid defence against
> > future bugs, but it's not strictly necessary.
>
> I should have mentioned in the changelog that this change sets the
> driver up for migrating the in_intensity0_thresh_period
> and in_proximity0_thresh_period sysfs attributes to be created by
> iio_event_spec. This is one of the patches that I held back until
> I am able to properly test it.
Cool. That's a good reason ;)
>
> Brian
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
