Hi Greg, > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 11:50 AM > To: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx> > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 08:39:20AM +0000, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 08:17:59PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > tree: > > > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg > > > it.ker > > > > nel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fgregkh%2Fstaging.git&da > > > ta > > > > =01%7C01%7Claurentiu.tudor%40nxp.com%7C751676566b8f465b5fa108d4bb1 > > > > 69974%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0&sdata=hDMOrVmq8h6I > > > MBDuCHgARD44vX58GOPYWIQSqMsdAjo%3D&reserved=0 staging-testing > > > > head: 18cd9021ea035db85519391dbc429a5b1d0dd25b > > > > commit: b065307fe0ad7859f01ce8560e6bdc590324561a [357/367] > staging: > > > > fsl-mc: remove dpmng API files > > > > config: arm64-allyesconfig (attached as .config) > > > > compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 > > > > reproduce: > > > > wget > > > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fr > > > aw.git > > > hubusercontent.com%2F01org%2Flkp- > > > > tests%2Fmaster%2Fsbin%2Fmake.cross&data=01%7C01%7Claurentiu.tudor%40 > > > > nxp.com%7C751676566b8f465b5fa108d4bb169974%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92c > > > > d99c5c301635%7C0&sdata=JvBQcG8MAs7PwDoXxYXe89sqs%2B2ADAiQd7sYCq > > > 0YbPE%3D&reserved=0 -O ~/bin/make.cross > > > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > > > git checkout b065307fe0ad7859f01ce8560e6bdc590324561a > > > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > > > make.cross ARCH=arm64 > > > > > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > > > >> make[5]: *** No rule to make target > > > > >> 'drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpmng.o', > > > needed by 'drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus-driver.o'. > > > > make[5]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors. > > > > > > Crap, this isn't good. But it looks like further patches fixes this issue, right? > > > > Wow, doesn't look like so. I don't know how I managed to screw this up > > so badly. :-( > > > > > Laurentiu, any ideas here? You do always test every individual > > > patch, right? :) > > > > Usually yes, but looks like this time I managed to mess it up. Sorry for the > trouble. > > > > > Note, if you all ever got multi-arch building working for this code, > > > I would have caught this a lot earlier, that should be something you > > > fix up to get this out of staging, no reason to only depend on one arch. > > > > Got it. I don't think there's any arch depended stuff in the code so there > shouldn't be issues. > > I'll fix up this series and submit a v2 of the whole patch set and after that look > into the multi-arch stuff. > > Is this ok? > > No, it's already in my tree, so either I revert the patch series, or I take a fixup > patch for it. Which do you want me to do? Let's go with reverting the whole series and me to resubmit a v2 because there are also a couple of comments from Joe Perches that I'd like to include. --- Thanks & Best Regards, Laurentiu _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
