On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:44:09PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:07:41PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > The most important thing is for the driver to be atomic if it's KMS > > > only, and it would be good to have someone review that properly. > > > > I believe it does not use the atomic APIs atm, so that would be one > > of the first things to fix then. Another question is if people > > (you and Daniel at least) can live with the non kernel-coding > > style shared files under the osindependent dir ? > > Why not just spend a few days and fix up all of the kernel-style issues > so it can be a "real" driver? It shouldn't take all that long, > especially for someone with Linux kernel experience (hint, hint...) > > Only put stuff in staging for a good reason, and that reason can be "I > don't know how to clean this stuff up", but I don't think that is the > case here... And why are you cc:ing a mailing list that does not accept non-members to post? that's just annoying... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
