On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 07:50:24PM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Also, don't be picky about the location, which incidentally fixes the
> build since MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT is gone on 2.6.37.
That comment is wrong. memblock_alloc() is still as picky as the
original.
phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
{
return memblock_alloc_base(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
}
/* Pump up max_addr */
if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
end = memblock.current_limit;
and current_limit is initialized to what was MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT. So,
memblock_alloc() will always allocate from lowmem.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
