On 11/10/2010 02:20 PM, Damian Varayud wrote: > @@ -291,21 +296,22 @@ static void __exit ni_tio_cleanup_module(void) > > module_exit(ni_tio_cleanup_module); > > struct ni_gpct_device *ni_gpct_device_construct(struct comedi_device *dev, > - void (*write_register) (struct > - ni_gpct > - * > - counter, > - unsigned > - bits, > - enum > - ni_gpct_register > - reg), > - unsigned (*read_register) > - (struct ni_gpct *counter, > - enum ni_gpct_register reg), > - enum ni_gpct_variant variant, > - unsigned num_counters) > + void (*write_register) > + (struct ni_gpct *counter, > + unsigned bits, > + enum ni_gpct_register reg), > + unsigned (*read_register) > + (struct ni_gpct *counter, > + enum ni_gpct_register reg), > + enum ni_gpct_variant variant, > + unsigned num_counters) I don't think this looks anyhow saner. What about shifting it left like: void (*write_register)(struct ni_gpct *counter, unsigned bits, enum ni_gpct_register reg), unsigned (*read_register)(struct ni_gpct *counter, enum ni_gpct_register reg), enum ni_gpct_variant variant, unsigned num_counters) regards, -- js _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel