Re: [PATCH] Staging: frontier: alphatrack: Fixed coding style issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Audun Hoem wrote:
> From: Audun Hoem <audun.hoem@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I cleaned up the coding style.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Audun Hoem <audun.hoem@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c |    9 ++++++---
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c b/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c
> index ef7fbf8..9d439fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c
> @@ -88,8 +88,11 @@ MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE("Frontier Designs Alphatrack Control Surface");
>  static int debug = ALPHATRACK_DEBUG;
>  
>  /* Use our own dbg macro */
> -#define dbg_info(dev, format, arg...) do \
> -    { if (debug) dev_info(dev , format , ## arg); } while (0)
> +#define dbg_info(dev, format, arg...) \
> +do {
> +	if (debug)
> +		dev_info(dev , format , ## arg);
> +} while (0)

Oops, no, this doesn't work, and it breaks the build.  Did you test your
patch after you made it?

(hint, you need to add a few more '\' characters...)

Care to redo this and resend it?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux