Re: [patch 2/3] Staging: sst: more dereferencing user pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 07:45:45PM +0530, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> >  	case _IOC_NR(SNDRV_SST_STREAM_SET_PARAMS): {
> > -		struct snd_sst_params *str_param = (struct snd_sst_params *)arg;
> > +		struct snd_sst_params str_param;
> Now this is a struct...
> > 
> [snip]
> > +
> >  		if (!str_id) {
> So this becomes bogus check, can be removed :-)

The check for str_id?  That comes from near the start of the function
and it's still needed.

> > 
> > +				retval = copy_to_user(dest, &retval, sizeof(__u32));
> >  				if (retval)
> >  					retval = -EFAULT;
> Trivial but this can be changed to 
> 				if (copy_to_user())
> 					retval = -EFAULT;	
> 
retval is the str_id here so you'd need an else statement as well.
				else
					retval = 0;
I can send a separate patch for this.

> Overall its good, tested it as well,

Thanks for that.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux