I just found this change has fatal problem. Due to this change there is no way to kill the process which is waiting for the SIGTERM event with down_interruptible(). If you have no objection, I will revert it to kernel_thread and send the patch. Please let me know. Thanks Nohee -----Original Message----- From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 5:43 AM To: Henry Ptasinski Cc: Jason Cooper; joe@xxxxxxxxxxx; jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nohee Ko; Brett Rudley Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v4] staging: brcm80211: remove kernel_thread() On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 07:28:50PM -0700, Henry Ptasinski wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 01:56:34PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 02:51:09PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > Fourth cut. Applied all of Jiri's recommendations. > > > > At first glance, this looks good. > > > > Henry, can you test these out to verify they still work properly? > > I don't see any behavioral differences with and without the patches. I can > scan, associate, and ping in 2.4GHz. Wonderful, I've applied them now. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
