brcm80211 typedef bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg,

Sorry, forgot to include the list.

Please forgive the simple question, but I want to make sure I'm doing this right.  In the adventure that has become typedef removal for brcm80211 I found this in or around drivers/staging/brcm80211/include/typedefs.h:73

#ifndef TYPEDEF_UINT32
typedef unsigned int uint32;
#endif

By itself, this should break 64bit builds, right?  As I carefully sed out uint32, should I do their literal substitution, 'unsigned int', or fix it with 'unsigned long'/'uint32_t'?

Up to this point, I've been strictly doing literal substitutions...

thx,

Jason.


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux