On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:19:38PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > > > Ok, I'll just keep this in my to-apply queue again, and then apply it > > when it is needed for Linus's tree. Is that ok? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > I found more compile errors (more API changes) with this driver in today > linux-next. > > I prepared a patch-set containing the previous patch sent and two more. > This three patches allow spectra driver to compile in today linux-next. > > Do you want me to do it this way (keeping a patchset) or should I send > separate patches as issues arises? > > The patchset I will send contains the following patches: > > [PATCH 1/3] fix staging/spectra: removes q->prepare_flush_fn > [PATCH 2/3] fix staging/spectra: use new REQ_FLUSH flag > [PATCH 3/3] fix staging/spectra: don't use locked_ioctl Three patches are fine, I'll keep them for when they are needed during the next merge window. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
