On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:34 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:00:35AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The rtl8192s_usb driver was claiming a number of device IDs which are > > actually supported by the code in the rtl8192u_usb driver. Remove > > them from rtl8192s_usb, and add more device IDs as listed in the > > vendor driver version 0003.0825.2009. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > I don't know whether the device IDs I'm adding actually work, but we may > > as well let people try them. > > I just applied a patch from Florian that should have worked all of this > out. Can you look at the linux-next tree tomorrow and verify that it is > all ok now? > > If not, can you resend whichever ids from these two patches that you > feel are still needed to be changed? The result in rtl8192su basically matches what I have, although Florian seems to have found a new version of the vendor driver with a few more IDs. (Florian, please send me it so I can add it to the archive at <http://people.debian.org/~benh/rtl-wlan/>.) I believe the second patch, for rtl8192u, is still applicable. At the end of the table in rtl8192su, Florian added: + /* these are not in the official list */ + {USB_DEVICE(0x050d, 0x815F)}, /* Belkin F5D8053 v6 */ + {USB_DEVICE(0x0df6, 0x004b)}, /* WL-349 */ However the first of these is included in the vendor driver... and further up the table in our version! Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
