On 06/17/2010 12:13 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 07:44:20AM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On 05/28/2010 09:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:38:53PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05/24/2010 07:48 PM, Nitin Gupta wrote: >>>>> Creates RAM based block devices: /dev/zramX (X = 0, 1, ...). >>>>> Pages written to these disks are compressed and stored in memory >>>>> itself. These disks allow very fast I/O and compression provides >>>>> good amounts of memory savings. >>>>> >>>>> This is enhancement over existing ramzswap driver which creates >>>>> virtual block devices (/dev/ramzswapX) which could be used only >>>>> as swap disks. >>>>> >>>>> Now, with the ability to handle any kind of I/O request, zram >>>>> devices have lot more use cases: >>>>> - /tmp storage >>>>> - various caches under /var >>>>> - swap disks >>>>> - maybe even more! :) >>>>> >>>>> Performance numbers can be found at: >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/zramperf >>>>> >>>> >>>> Any reviews/comments, please? >>> >>> We are all busy with the .35-rc1 merge work at the moment, sorry. >>> >> >> Can you please apply these patches to linux-next? > > Yes, I'm working on it, I should get to it by the end of this week. > >> or maybe for .35-rc3/rc4 too? > > No, this is not a bugfix, why would it be acceptable for the .35 kernel > release? > Since its a staging driver, I thought any kind of changes can be pulled in mainline too. Maybe I still don't understand how -staging works :) Anyways, thanks for taking it in linux-next. Nitin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel