On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 09:37:06AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 09:41:36AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > On Sunday 06 June 2010 03:23:28 you wrote: > > > In today linux-next I got a compile warning in staging/batman-adv. > > > > > > This is due a struct bin_attribute read function prototype change and the > > > driver was not updated. > > > > > > This patch solves the issue > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <martinez.javier@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > [...] > > > > > > -static ssize_t transtable_local_read(struct kobject *kobj, > > [...] > > > > > > -static ssize_t transtable_global_read(struct kobject *kobj, > > [...] > > > > > > -static ssize_t originators_read(struct kobject *kobj, > > [...] > > > > > > -static ssize_t vis_data_read(struct kobject *kobj, > > [...] > > > > These files were already removed and the patch is waiting in GregKH's queue. > > Hm, but those files are not going to be removed until 2.6.36, right? So > I think we need this patch now to keep 2.6.35 working properly. Or am I > mistaken? No, this is correct. I just wanted to write a short notice... but it was a little bit too short. Situation: * Files were removed (actually moved to debugfs) for 2.6.36 * patches for that were already send to Greg * this patch conflicts with at least one patch we already sent How it was (hopefully) resolved: * this and another patch was applied in our repo in a special 2.6.35 branch * our debugfs patches (and patches we send at the same time) were rebased * new patches for 2.6.35 and again _all_ patches for 2.6.36 were send to Greg some days ago I hope that it is ok for Greg. Otherwise he would have to fix the merge conflicts - extra work which (at least I think) isn't is duty. I am not happy about the resubmission, but maybe we find a good way to coordinate the submission of patches a little bit better. And forgot also to thank Javier - it seems that I completely missed that change or it came at the same time we submitted out things to Greg (not sure about that - but in case of doubt, just say that it was my fault). Best regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
