On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 07:54:36PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Greg, wait! > >> > >> No need for this. I understand the problem, can imagine why it > >> happened and I don't mind the wrong authorship. I prefer avoiding the > >> general head-ache of rebasing the whole tree. > >> > >> To be honest I noticed this in yesterday's emails but I decided to not > >> mention it. > >> > >> Marek, > >> Any beers for me then :P > > > > So, i will wait until somebody has time to visit the post office and > > work out which is cheaper: Beer to Greg, or Beer to Luis. > > > > Andrew > > > > Make it for Greg :) Ok, I've rebased the staging-next tree on 2.6.34-rc6, reapplied the patches, and then took your 26 patches and applied them and pushed everything out. Can someone verify that I got it all correct? Oh, and you owe me one bottle of "Tactical Nuclear Penguin" :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
