Re: Staging: dt3155: Cleanup memory mapped i/o access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 06:33:08PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Monday, May 03, 2010 3:45 PM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> >>> Could the next tree be out of sync with your tree?
> >>
> >> Hm, some other tree might be doing something in those files.  But the
> >> fact that the drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_io.h was so wrong it thought
> >> it was a revert, makes me suspect that you did it against something
> >> else.
> >>
> >> If you make this against my staging-next tree at
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-next-2.6.git
> >> Using the staging-next branch, does that make the patch different?
> >
> > Ok.  Pulled your staging-next (thanks Joe).
> >
> > It's way different from linux-next and matches Linus' tree exactly.  It's
> > missing all of your "Drop the "_s"..." and "The typedef is not needed." 
> > patches.
> >
> > Of course I could be on the wrong branch for your staging-next tree.  The
> > only branches listed are:
> >
> > $ git branch -a
> > * master
> >   remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
> >   remotes/origin/master
> 
> It appears these are the patches missing in your staging-next tree that do
> exist in the linux-next tree:
> 
> Staging: dt3155: remove "inline" usage
> Staging: dt3155: rename dt3155_fbuffer_s
> Staging: dt3155: rename dt3155_config_s
> Staging: dt3155: rename dt3155_read_t
> Staging: dt3155: rename dt3155_status_t
> Staging: dt3155: remove frame_info_t
> Staging: dt3155: remove TRUE/FALSE
> Staging: dt3155: remove #ifdef
> Staging: dt3155: allocator.c: sparse cleanups
> Staging: dt3155: fix parentheses and bracket spacing style issues
> Staging: dt3155: fix coding style issue in dt3155_isr.c
> Staging: dt3155: fix wait_ibsyclr function
> Staging: remove unused #include <linux/version.h>

Odd, what branch did they come from?

> The first one that exists in both is:
> 
> Staging: dt3155: fix 50Hz configuration
> 
> Could the others be in a staging-stable branch?

I do not know, they don't look to be something I've seen.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux